Infants Lack Strong Parental Attachments
In a report published by Sutton Trust, researchers from
Princeton University, Columbia University, and the London School of Economics
and Political Science and the University of Bristol found that infants under
the age of three who do not form strong bonds with their mothers or fathers are
more likely to be aggressive, defiant and hyperactive as adults. These bonds, or secure attachments, are
formed through early parental care, such as picking up a child when he or she
cries or holding and reassuring a child.
According to the study of nearly 14,000 children, 40% of these children
lack the “strong emotional bonds” that are crucial to success later in
life. Who is to blame here?
The
analysis, written by Sophie Moullin
and others, says that actions such as holding a baby lovingly and responding to
a baby’s needs support children’s social and emotional development. This, in turn, strengthens a child’s cognitive development. Researchers say that further developed children
are more likely to be “resilient to poverty, family instability, parental
stress and depression”. So, the 40% of
those studied who lack secure attachments are more likely to have poorer
language and behavior before entering school, which is just one example,
according to researchers. An interesting
statistic from the study stated that of the 40% who lack secure attachments,
25% avoid their parents when they are upset and 15% resist their parents. Both are attributed to the distress caused by
the children’s parents.
Susan
Campbell, a professor at the University of Pittsburgh, says in the article “…When caregivers are
overwhelmed because of their own difficulties, infants are more likely to learn
that the world is not a safe place- leading them to become needy, frustrated,
withdrawn, or disorganized”. The point
the researchers seem to be making with this study is that many parents need
more support to provide proper parenting, including family leave, home visits
and income supports. So, what do you
think? Can poor behavior be “linked” directly
to the parents? Rather, is it entirely
their fault for not nurturing their children from a young age, or is this idea
preposterous?
-Posted by: Taylor Schille (3)
This was a great article Taylor! Its funny that this article mentions always going to the baby if its crying because I always heard it was good to let them cry it out and not become so dependent. This article really makes you evaluate how you are going to parent your possible children in the future.
ReplyDeletePosted by Jacob Geier
I agree, Jacob. I have always heard that you are supposed to let the baby learn to self-soothe. It makes you wonder if there is a certain middle ground between how often you allow the baby to cry before you soothe him or her.
Delete-Taylor Schille
This is a very interesting take on the nurture vs nature debate. Parental care is definitely important in a child's life, but I wonder if their behavior can be shaped by something other than the caregiver. Do you know of any cases in which a child formed a strong bond with their caregiver but turned out to have poor behavior?
ReplyDeletePosted by: Lindsey Janof
There were no mentions of that in this article, Lindsey. I think that there must be an example of this somewhere, because I do not see how every single solitary case would be a positive response.
Delete-Taylor Schille